Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
Alias-PIX

Alias PIX Image

image/x-alias-pix
VS

Fujifilm RAW Image

image/x-fuji-raf
Fuji-RAF

A complete technical comparison of Alias PIX Image and Fujifilm RAW Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature Alias-PIX Fuji-RAF
Transparency (Alpha) ✕ No ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support ✕ No Yes
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
Alias PIX Image
image/x-alias-pix
Extension
.pix.als.alias.img
Container Alias PIX Header
Compression Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
RLE
Color Depth 24-bit (RGB), 8-bit (Matte/Grayscale variant)
Developed by Alias Research (Later Alias|Wavefront / Autodesk)
Released Early 1990s
Magic Bytes
No explicit magic bytes (Relies on 10-byte integer header)
Full Alias-PIX reference →
Fujifilm RAW Image
image/x-fuji-raf
Extension
.raf
Container Proprietary RAF Container
Compression Uncompressed / Lossless Compressed / Lossy Compressed (Modern firmware)
Algorithm
NoneProprietary LosslessProprietary Lossy
Color Depth 14-bit (Per Channel - X-Series), 16-bit (Per Channel - GFX Series)
Developed by Fujifilm Corporation
Released 2000
Magic Bytes
46 55 4A 49 46 49 4C 4D 43 43 44 2D 52 41 57 20
Full Fuji-RAF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser Alias-PIX Fuji-RAF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
Alias-PIX

Alias-PIX Strengths

  • The highly simplified structure made it incredibly fast to encode and decode on early 1990s SGI hardware
  • Lossless Run-Length Encoding (RLE) saved disk space without degrading the quality of final 3D renders
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete, having been replaced by more robust formats like TIFF, TGA, and EXR in modern 3D pipelines
  • The lack of a distinct magic byte signature makes reliable automated file detection almost impossible
  • Does not support integrated alpha channels, instead requiring cumbersome, separate 'Matte' files to denote transparency
Fuji-RAF

Fuji-RAF Strengths

  • Retains absolute maximum sensor data, enabling massive shadow recovery and highlight protection compared to compressed in-camera JPEGs
  • Stores proprietary Fujifilm Film Simulation metadata (like Classic Chrome or Acros), allowing editors to perfectly replicate in-camera aesthetics
  • Very distinct and reliable magic header makes programmatic file detection foolproof
Limitations
  • Proprietary format requires continuous updates to third-party software (like Lightroom) whenever Fujifilm releases a new camera
  • The X-Trans sensor matrix requires highly specialized demosaicing algorithms that are extremely computationally expensive, leading to slower import and rendering times
  • Completely unsupported in standard web browsers and basic operating system image viewers

When to choose which format

Alias-PIX
Use Alias-PIX when…
  • Legacy Alias PowerAnimator Textures
  • 1990s SGI Workstation Render Outputs
  • Historical 3D Graphics Archival
Fuji-RAF
Use Fuji-RAF when…
  • Professional Digital Photography
  • Fujifilm X-Trans Sensor Image Archival
  • High Dynamic Range (HDR) Post-Processing

More comparisons

Alias-PIX vs ACES → Fuji-RAF vs ACES → Alias-PIX vs APNG → Fuji-RAF vs APNG → Alias-PIX vs AVCI → Fuji-RAF vs AVCI → Alias-PIX vs AVCS → Fuji-RAF vs AVCS → Alias-PIX vs AVIF → Fuji-RAF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison