Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
AIMG

Universal AI Media Format (Image)

image/prs.aimg
VS

Silicon Graphics Image

image/x-rgb
SGI-RGB

A complete technical comparison of Universal AI Media Format (Image) and Silicon Graphics Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature AIMG SGI-RGB
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support Yes ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata Yes ✕ No
ICC Color Profile Yes ✕ No
Universal AI Media Format (Image)
image/prs.aimg
Extension
.aimg
Container Universal AI Media Format (AIMF)
Compression Container (Inherits payload compression, e.g., PNG/JPEG)
Algorithm
None (Pass-through to embedded payload)
Color Depth Inherited from payload (8-bit, 16-bit, HDR)
Developed by AI Media Format (ai-mf) Open-Source Project
Released 2026
Magic Bytes
Varies (Custom AIMF Header Prepended to Payload)
Full AIMG reference →
Silicon Graphics Image
image/x-rgb
Extension
.rgb.sgi.rgba.bw.int.inta
Container SGI Image Header (512 bytes)
Compression Uncompressed / Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
NoneScanline RLE
Color Depth 8-bit (Per Channel), 16-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by Silicon Graphics, Inc. (Paul Haeberli)
Released 1988
Magic Bytes
01 DA
Full SGI-RGB reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser AIMG SGI-RGB
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
AIMG

AIMG Strengths

  • Provides a robust, tamper-evident cryptographic wrapper to definitively prove the origin of AI-generated media
  • Header-first structure allows verifier nodes and APIs to validate an image's origin without needing to download or decode the entire massive pixel payload
Limitations
  • Lacks native rendering support in browsers, requiring server-side extraction or client-side WebAssembly to display the embedded image
  • Utilizes the IANA 'prs.' (personal/vanity) tree rather than the standards tree, which can cause strict enterprise firewalls to reject the MIME type as unverified
SGI-RGB

SGI-RGB Strengths

  • Supports 16-bit precision per channel and an embedded alpha channel, making it ideal for the demanding compositing workflows of 1990s cinema VFX
  • The scanline-based RLE compression was exceptionally fast to decode on classic MIPS-based SGI workstations
  • Features a straightforward 512-byte header, making it relatively easy to parse and write custom decoders in C or Python
Limitations
  • Completely obsolete and unsupported in modern web environments
  • Replaced entirely by TIFF, OpenEXR, and PNG in modern visual effects and 3D rendering pipelines
  • Lacks support for modern color management via ICC profiles or advanced EXIF metadata

When to choose which format

AIMG
Use AIMG when…
  • AI Provenance and Attribution
  • Verifiable Deepfake Prevention
  • Cryptographic Media Watermarking
  • Generative AI Workflows
SGI-RGB
Use SGI-RGB when…
  • Legacy 3D Animation and VFX Textures
  • Silicon Graphics IRIX Workstation Archival
  • 1990s Medical Imaging

More comparisons

AIMG vs ACES → SGI-RGB vs ACES → AIMG vs APNG → SGI-RGB vs APNG → AIMG vs AVCI → SGI-RGB vs AVCI → AIMG vs AVCS → SGI-RGB vs AVCS → AIMG vs AVIF → SGI-RGB vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison