Image MIME Reference
ACES
ACES Image Container File
image/aces
VS
Sony SRF Raw Image
image/x-sony-srf
Sony-SRF
A complete technical comparison of ACES Image Container File and Sony SRF Raw Image — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | ACES | Sony-SRF |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | Yes |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
ACES Image Container File
image/aces
Extension
.exr
Container
OpenEXR (SMPTE ST 2065-4)
Compression
Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
PIZZIPRLEB44Uncompressed
Color Depth
16-bit (Half-float), 32-bit (Float)
Developed by
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) / SMPTE
Released
2013
Magic Bytes
76 2F 31 01
Sony SRF Raw Image
image/x-sony-srf
Extension
.srf
Container
TIFF-based (Proprietary)
Compression
Uncompressed
Algorithm
None
Color Depth
12-bit (Per Channel)
Developed by
Sony Corporation
Released
2003
Magic Bytes
49 49 2A 00
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | ACES | Sony-SRF |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
ACES
ACES Strengths
- Industry standard for high-end visual effects, compositing, and color grading
- Supports 16-bit half-float data, accurately capturing immense dynamic range without clipping
- Standardized by SMPTE (ST 2065-4) to guarantee universal color interoperability across different post-production facilities
Limitations
- Considerably larger file sizes than conventional consumer image formats
- Completely unsupported in web browsers and most standard desktop viewers
- Requires specialized compositing or color grading software to interpret and view the scene-linear data correctly
Sony-SRF
Sony-SRF Strengths
- Retains perfectly raw, unprocessed sensor data from legacy early-2000s cameras, allowing modern raw processors to extract much better dynamic range and color than the camera's original internal JPEG engine could
- Utilizes a standard TIFF container structure, ensuring broad compatibility with community-maintained open-source decoding libraries like LibRaw
Limitations
- Completely obsolete format that has long been abandoned in favor of ARW
- MIME detection via magic bytes is unreliable due to TIFF header spoofing, requiring deeper EXIF inspection for accurate routing
- Cannot be natively viewed in web browsers or standard operating system image viewers without specialized decoders
When to choose which format
ACES
Use ACES when…
- Visual Effects (VFX)
- Digital Intermediate (DI)
- Color Grading
- Archival
Sony-SRF
Use Sony-SRF when…
- Legacy Sony Cyber-shot Photography
- Non-destructive Image Post-Processing
- Early 2000s Raw Imaging Archival