Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
ACES

ACES Image Container File

image/aces
VS

Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias)

image/pjpeg
PJPEG

A complete technical comparison of ACES Image Container File and Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias) — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

PJPEG wins on browser support

Feature Support

Feature ACES PJPEG
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No Yes
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
ACES Image Container File
image/aces
Extension
.exr
Container OpenEXR (SMPTE ST 2065-4)
Compression Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
PIZZIPRLEB44Uncompressed
Color Depth 16-bit (Half-float), 32-bit (Float)
Developed by Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) / SMPTE
Released 2013
Magic Bytes
76 2F 31 01
Full ACES reference →
Progressive JPEG (Legacy IE Alias)
image/pjpeg
Extension
.jpeg.jpg.pjpeg.pjp.jfif
Container JPEG (ISO/IEC 10918-1)
Compression Lossy (DCT)
Algorithm
Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT)
Color Depth 8-bit, 12-bit
Developed by Joint Photographic Experts Group / Microsoft (Alias)
Released 1992
Magic Bytes
FF D8 FF E0 (JFIF) / FF D8 FF E1 (Exif)
Full PJPEG reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser ACES PJPEG
Chrome Chrome
✕
✓ All
Firefox Firefox
✕
✓ All
Safari Safari
✕
✓ All
Edge Edge
✕
✓ All
IE IE (Legacy)
✕
✓
ACES

ACES Strengths

  • Industry standard for high-end visual effects, compositing, and color grading
  • Supports 16-bit half-float data, accurately capturing immense dynamic range without clipping
  • Standardized by SMPTE (ST 2065-4) to guarantee universal color interoperability across different post-production facilities
Limitations
  • Considerably larger file sizes than conventional consumer image formats
  • Completely unsupported in web browsers and most standard desktop viewers
  • Requires specialized compositing or color grading software to interpret and view the scene-linear data correctly
PJPEG

PJPEG Strengths

  • Progressive JPEGs (which this MIME type attempted to describe) provide excellent perceived loading speeds on slow connections by rendering a low-resolution preview first
  • Files sent with this MIME type are fully backwards compatible with any standard JPEG decoder
Limitations
  • It is a non-standard MIME type that violates IANA specifications
  • Causes strict file upload validation scripts to fail if not explicitly whitelisted or mapped
  • Creates unnecessary confusion, as the official image/jpeg MIME type already fully encompasses progressive encoding

When to choose which format

ACES
Use ACES when…
  • Visual Effects (VFX)
  • Digital Intermediate (DI)
  • Color Grading
  • Archival
PJPEG
Use PJPEG when…
  • Legacy Internet Explorer File Uploads
  • Progressive Image Rendering (Historical context)

More comparisons

ACES vs APNG → PJPEG vs APNG → ACES vs AVCI → PJPEG vs AVCI → ACES vs AVCS → PJPEG vs AVCS → ACES vs AVIF → PJPEG vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison