Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
ACES

ACES Image Container File

image/aces
VS

PiCture eXchange

image/x-pcx
PCX

A complete technical comparison of ACES Image Container File and PiCture eXchange — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature ACES PCX
Transparency (Alpha) Yes ✕ No
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
ACES Image Container File
image/aces
Extension
.exr
Container OpenEXR (SMPTE ST 2065-4)
Compression Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
PIZZIPRLEB44Uncompressed
Color Depth 16-bit (Half-float), 32-bit (Float)
Developed by Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) / SMPTE
Released 2013
Magic Bytes
76 2F 31 01
Full ACES reference →
PiCture eXchange
image/x-pcx
Extension
.pcx
Container ZSoft Proprietary Header (128 bytes)
Compression Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Algorithm
ZSoft RLE
Color Depth 1-bit (Monochrome), 4-bit (16 colors), 8-bit (256 colors), 24-bit (True Color)
Developed by ZSoft Corporation
Released 1985
Magic Bytes
0A (followed by version, e.g., 0A 05 01 08)
Full PCX reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser ACES PCX
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
ACES

ACES Strengths

  • Industry standard for high-end visual effects, compositing, and color grading
  • Supports 16-bit half-float data, accurately capturing immense dynamic range without clipping
  • Standardized by SMPTE (ST 2065-4) to guarantee universal color interoperability across different post-production facilities
Limitations
  • Considerably larger file sizes than conventional consumer image formats
  • Completely unsupported in web browsers and most standard desktop viewers
  • Requires specialized compositing or color grading software to interpret and view the scene-linear data correctly
PCX

PCX Strengths

  • Incredibly simple RLE algorithm makes it very fast to decode, which was historically vital for early 3D video game engines
  • Retains crisp, lossless pixel data suitable for pixel art and interface assets
  • Well-documented and highly supported by older desktop publishing and image editing software
Limitations
  • Extremely inefficient compression by modern standards, producing large file sizes compared to PNG
  • Lacks modern imaging features such as alpha channel transparency, EXIF metadata, and color profiles
  • Zero support in web browsers; must be converted to PNG for web use

When to choose which format

ACES
Use ACES when…
  • Visual Effects (VFX)
  • Digital Intermediate (DI)
  • Color Grading
  • Archival
PCX
Use PCX when…
  • MS-DOS and Early Windows Graphics
  • 1990s Video Game Assets (Textures, UI)
  • Retro Computing Archival

More comparisons

ACES vs APNG → PCX vs APNG → ACES vs AVCI → PCX vs AVCI → ACES vs AVCS → PCX vs AVCS → ACES vs AVIF → PCX vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison