Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
ACES

ACES Image Container File

image/aces
VS

Windows Enhanced Metafile

image/x-emf
EMF

A complete technical comparison of ACES Image Container File and Windows Enhanced Metafile — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature ACES EMF
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No Yes
ACES Image Container File
image/aces
Extension
.exr
Container OpenEXR (SMPTE ST 2065-4)
Compression Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
PIZZIPRLEB44Uncompressed
Color Depth 16-bit (Half-float), 32-bit (Float)
Developed by Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) / SMPTE
Released 2013
Magic Bytes
76 2F 31 01
Full ACES reference →
Windows Enhanced Metafile
image/x-emf
Extension
.emf
Container Windows GDI/GDI+ Record Sequence
Compression Uncompressed (Binary Drawing Records)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Vector (32-bit GDI/GDI+ Colors), Supports embedded 24-bit/32-bit bitmaps
Developed by Microsoft Corporation
Released 1993
Magic Bytes
01 00 00 00 (Header Type) ... 20 45 4D 46 (Signature at offset 40)
Full EMF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser ACES EMF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕
✓
ACES

ACES Strengths

  • Industry standard for high-end visual effects, compositing, and color grading
  • Supports 16-bit half-float data, accurately capturing immense dynamic range without clipping
  • Standardized by SMPTE (ST 2065-4) to guarantee universal color interoperability across different post-production facilities
Limitations
  • Considerably larger file sizes than conventional consumer image formats
  • Completely unsupported in web browsers and most standard desktop viewers
  • Requires specialized compositing or color grading software to interpret and view the scene-linear data correctly
EMF

EMF Strengths

  • Device independent, meaning it renders consistently across different monitors and printers regardless of resolution
  • Fully supports 32-bit precision and advanced GDI+ drawing commands, including alpha transparency and anti-aliasing (EMF+)
  • Native rendering within the Windows OS ensures fast performance and flawless fidelity in Microsoft Office applications
Limitations
  • Heavily tied to the Windows Graphics Device Interface API, making it notoriously difficult to parse perfectly on macOS or Linux
  • Completely unsupported by modern web standards; cannot be embedded in HTML without conversion to SVG
  • Security history: Like WMF, malicious drawing records can theoretically exploit vulnerabilities in older GDI parsers

When to choose which format

ACES
Use ACES when…
  • Visual Effects (VFX)
  • Digital Intermediate (DI)
  • Color Grading
  • Archival
EMF
Use EMF when…
  • Microsoft Office Vector Graphics and Clip Art
  • Windows Print Spooling (EMF Spool Files)
  • High-fidelity Vector Interchange on Windows

More comparisons

ACES vs APNG → EMF vs APNG → ACES vs AVCI → EMF vs AVCI → ACES vs AVCS → EMF vs AVCS → ACES vs AVIF → EMF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison