Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
ACES

ACES Image Container File

image/aces
VS

Drawing Exchange Format

image/vnd.dxf
DXF

A complete technical comparison of ACES Image Container File and Drawing Exchange Format — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature ACES DXF
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No ✕ No
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
ACES Image Container File
image/aces
Extension
.exr
Container OpenEXR (SMPTE ST 2065-4)
Compression Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
PIZZIPRLEB44Uncompressed
Color Depth 16-bit (Half-float), 32-bit (Float)
Developed by Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) / SMPTE
Released 2013
Magic Bytes
76 2F 31 01
Full ACES reference →
Drawing Exchange Format
image/vnd.dxf
Extension
.dxf
Container Text / Binary Container
Compression Uncompressed (ASCII) / Uncompressed (Binary)
Algorithm
None
Color Depth Vector (Indexed AutoCAD Colors / True Color)
Developed by Autodesk
Released 1982
Magic Bytes
30 0D 0A 53 45 43 54 49 4F 4E (ASCII) / 41 75 74 6F 43 41 44 20 42 69 6E 61 72 79 20 44 58 46 0D 0A 1A 00 (Binary)
Full DXF reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser ACES DXF
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
ACES

ACES Strengths

  • Industry standard for high-end visual effects, compositing, and color grading
  • Supports 16-bit half-float data, accurately capturing immense dynamic range without clipping
  • Standardized by SMPTE (ST 2065-4) to guarantee universal color interoperability across different post-production facilities
Limitations
  • Considerably larger file sizes than conventional consumer image formats
  • Completely unsupported in web browsers and most standard desktop viewers
  • Requires specialized compositing or color grading software to interpret and view the scene-linear data correctly
DXF

DXF Strengths

  • Universally supported by almost every CAD program, 3D modeler, and vector graphics editor in existence
  • ASCII structure is human-readable and can be parsed or generated programmatically with relative ease
  • The de facto standard for sending 2D cutting paths to CNC routers, plasma cutters, and laser engravers
Limitations
  • ASCII DXF files can be enormously large and inefficient compared to binary DWG files
  • The format relies heavily on legacy AutoCAD data structures, making complex 3D entity parsing extremely difficult for third-party developers
  • Lacks native web browser rendering capabilities

When to choose which format

ACES
Use ACES when…
  • Visual Effects (VFX)
  • Digital Intermediate (DI)
  • Color Grading
  • Archival
DXF
Use DXF when…
  • Cross-Platform CAD Data Exchange
  • CNC Machining and Laser Cutting Paths
  • PCB Design Outlines
  • Architectural 2D Layouts

More comparisons

ACES vs APNG → DXF vs APNG → ACES vs AVCI → DXF vs AVCI → ACES vs AVCS → DXF vs AVCS → ACES vs AVIF → DXF vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison