Free webp to jpg
EN
Image MIME Reference
ACES

ACES Image Container File

image/aces
VS

DjVu Document

image/vnd.djvu
DjVu

A complete technical comparison of ACES Image Container File and DjVu Document — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.

Equal browser support

Feature Support

Feature ACES DjVu
Transparency (Alpha) Yes Yes
Animation Support ✕ No ✕ No
Progressive Loading ✕ No Yes
HDR Support Yes ✕ No
EXIF Metadata ✕ No ✕ No
ICC Color Profile ✕ No ✕ No
ACES Image Container File
image/aces
Extension
.exr
Container OpenEXR (SMPTE ST 2065-4)
Compression Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
PIZZIPRLEB44Uncompressed
Color Depth 16-bit (Half-float), 32-bit (Float)
Developed by Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) / SMPTE
Released 2013
Magic Bytes
76 2F 31 01
Full ACES reference →
DjVu Document
image/vnd.djvu
Extension
.djvu.djv
Container Interchange File Format (IFF)
Compression JB2 (Bi-tonal Text) / IW44 (Wavelet Background) / BZZ (General Data/Text)
Algorithm
JB2IW44BZZ
Color Depth 1-bit (Foreground Text), 24-bit (Background)
Developed by AT&T Labs (Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Patrick Haffner, Paul G. Howard)
Released 1996
Magic Bytes
41 54 26 54 46 4F 52 4D
Full DjVu reference →

Browser Support Comparison

Browser ACES DjVu
Chrome Chrome
✕ ✕
Firefox Firefox
✕ ✕
Safari Safari
✕ ✕
Edge Edge
✕ ✕
IE IE (Legacy)
✕ ✕
ACES

ACES Strengths

  • Industry standard for high-end visual effects, compositing, and color grading
  • Supports 16-bit half-float data, accurately capturing immense dynamic range without clipping
  • Standardized by SMPTE (ST 2065-4) to guarantee universal color interoperability across different post-production facilities
Limitations
  • Considerably larger file sizes than conventional consumer image formats
  • Completely unsupported in web browsers and most standard desktop viewers
  • Requires specialized compositing or color grading software to interpret and view the scene-linear data correctly
DjVu

DjVu Strengths

  • Unmatched compression ratios for high-resolution scanned documents (often 5 to 10 times smaller than equivalent JPEG/TIFF-based PDFs)
  • Separates text layers cleanly from backgrounds, allowing for highly legible text even at low file sizes
  • Embedded OCR (Optical Character Recognition) text layers allow for fast searching
Limitations
  • Lacks native support in modern operating systems and web browsers, requiring third-party software
  • Largely superseded by PDF/A and modern PDF compression standards in standard corporate workflows
  • Not suitable for vector graphics or born-digital documents (like Word exports), where standard PDF is far superior

When to choose which format

ACES
Use ACES when…
  • Visual Effects (VFX)
  • Digital Intermediate (DI)
  • Color Grading
  • Archival
DjVu
Use DjVu when…
  • Scanned Books and Manuals
  • Digital Libraries (e.g., Internet Archive)
  • Historical Document Archiving

More comparisons

ACES vs APNG → DjVu vs APNG → ACES vs AVCI → DjVu vs AVCI → ACES vs AVCS → DjVu vs AVCS → ACES vs AVIF → DjVu vs AVIF → All comparisons →
Share this comparison