Image MIME Reference
ACES
ACES Image Container File
image/aces
VS
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
DICOM-RLE
A complete technical comparison of ACES Image Container File and DICOM Run-Length Encoding — covering compression, feature support, browser compatibility, magic bytes, and when to choose each format.
Equal browser support
Feature Support
| Feature | ACES | DICOM-RLE |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency (Alpha) | Yes | ✕ No |
| Animation Support | ✕ No | Yes |
| Progressive Loading | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| EXIF Metadata | ✕ No | ✕ No |
| ICC Color Profile | ✕ No | Yes |
ACES Image Container File
image/aces
Extension
.exr
Container
OpenEXR (SMPTE ST 2065-4)
Compression
Lossless / Uncompressed
Algorithm
PIZZIPRLEB44Uncompressed
Color Depth
16-bit (Half-float), 32-bit (Float)
Developed by
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) / SMPTE
Released
2013
Magic Bytes
76 2F 31 01
DICOM Run-Length Encoding
image/dicom-rle
Extension
.dcm.dicom
Container
DICOM (PS3.10)
Compression
Lossless (RLE)
Algorithm
Run-Length Encoding (RLE)
Color Depth
8-bit, 16-bit, 24-bit
Developed by
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) / ACR
Released
1993
Magic Bytes
44 49 43 4D (at byte offset 128)
Browser Support Comparison
| Browser | ACES | DICOM-RLE |
|---|---|---|
Chrome
|
✕ | ✕ |
Firefox
|
✕ | ✕ |
Safari
|
✕ | ✕ |
Edge
|
✕ | ✕ |
IE (Legacy)
|
✕ | ✕ |
ACES
ACES Strengths
- Industry standard for high-end visual effects, compositing, and color grading
- Supports 16-bit half-float data, accurately capturing immense dynamic range without clipping
- Standardized by SMPTE (ST 2065-4) to guarantee universal color interoperability across different post-production facilities
Limitations
- Considerably larger file sizes than conventional consumer image formats
- Completely unsupported in web browsers and most standard desktop viewers
- Requires specialized compositing or color grading software to interpret and view the scene-linear data correctly
DICOM-RLE
DICOM-RLE Strengths
- Guarantees lossless preservation of critical medical data necessary for diagnostics
- Extremely robust metadata structure containing patient information, modality, and spatial geometry
- Faster to encode and decode than complex compression schemes like JPEG 2000
Limitations
- RLE compression offers very low compression ratios compared to modern codecs like JPEG-LS or JPEG 2000
- Zero support in web browsers or standard consumer image viewers
- Strict data privacy regulations (HIPAA/GDPR) make handling DICOM files complex due to embedded PHI
When to choose which format
ACES
Use ACES when…
- Visual Effects (VFX)
- Digital Intermediate (DI)
- Color Grading
- Archival
DICOM-RLE
Use DICOM-RLE when…
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound
- X-Rays / CT / MRI
- PACS Archives